Trends in Retirement and Retirement Income Choices by Tiaa Participants: 2000–2018

24 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2022

See all articles by Jeffrey R. Brown

Jeffrey R. Brown

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); University of Illinois College of Law; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Institute of Government and Public Affairs (IGPA); University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Economics

James M. Poterba

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

David P. Richardson

TIAA Institute

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: October 24, 2022

Abstract

This paper documents trends over the last two decades in retirement and retirement income choices by TIAA participants. From 2000-2018, the distribution of retirement ages shifted to older ages. The average retirement age rose by approximately 1.3 years for women and 2 years for men. There is considerable variation in the elapsed time between retirement and the start of income draws from a participant’s retirement plan account, with only 40% of participants taking an initial income payment within 48 months of retirement. The combination of later working lives and delayed first retirement income led to a growing fraction of TIAA participants reaching the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) age before taking any initial income draws. From 2000 to 2018, the fraction of retirees taking no income until their RMD rose from 10% to 52%. Concurrently, the fraction of first-time retirement income claimants who selected a life-contingent annuitized payout stream declined from 61% to 18%. Among those who made an initial income selection before age 70, annuitization rates were significantly higher than among those who began income draws at an older age. About one-fifth of retirees received more than one type of income; the most common pairing was an RMD and a life annuity. Among all participants receiving retirement distributions, the proportion who had a life annuity as part of their payout strategy fell from 52% to 31% between 2008 and 2018, although a life annuity remained the most common form of retirement income distribution. By comparison, the proportion taking an RMD payment roughly doubled, from 16% to 29%. We find evidence that an RMD is becoming the de facto default distribution option for newly retired TIAA participants.

Keywords: TIAA, RMD, required, minimum, distribution, retirement, income, life annuity, payout, strategy, de facto, default, participants

JEL Classification: G51, J32, G11

Suggested Citation

Brown, Jeffrey R. and Poterba, James M. and Richardson, David P., Trends in Retirement and Retirement Income Choices by Tiaa Participants: 2000–2018 (October 24, 2022). TIAA Institute Research Paper Series No. 01, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4256792 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4256792

Jeffrey R. Brown (Contact Author)

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Finance ( email )

1206 South Sixth Street
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

University of Illinois College of Law ( email )

504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Institute of Government and Public Affairs (IGPA) ( email )

Urbana, IL 61801
United States

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Department of Economics ( email )

410 David Kinley Hall
1407 W. Gregory
Urbana, IL 61801
United States

James M. Poterba

National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) ( email )

1050 Massachusetts Avenue
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

77 Massachusetts Avenue
50 Memorial Drive
Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
United States

David P. Richardson

TIAA Institute ( email )

8500 Andrew Carnegie Blvd
BET/04/01
Charlotte, NC 28262
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.tiaa-crefinstitute.org/public/institute

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Abstract Views
750
Rank
523,447
PlumX Metrics