Is Employee- Client Matching Good for Firms Targeting the Bottom of the Pyramid? A Study of Microfinance Institutions

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine whether there exists employee-client matching at the Bottom of the Pyramid (BOP) as well as the most favourable employee- client categorization in terms of employee productivity when serving the BOP market. This is important in a bid to determine how to effectively operate at the BOP given the market’s unique characteristics.

Design/methodology/approach: This study uses two methods depending on the research question. Firstly, a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to determine the different employee-client categories based on socio-economic status. Secondly, Fixed Effects analysis are performed based on these categories to determine the most suitable employee-client category.

Findings: The results show the existence of employee-client matching based on similar socio-economic status. However, multivariate testing reveals that the mismatch category, where employees are of higher socio-economic status than the clients, generates more favourable employee productivity. Moreover, this result may be contingent on the geographical location of the firm.

Practical implications: The findings are important for human resource management particularly, the employment strategy of BOP firms. It suggests the need to consider employee profiles as well as client profiles when deciding which new markets to target.

Originality/value: The paper uses a global database of microfinance institutions as a case of BOP firms to investigate employee-client matching at the bottom of the pyramid.

Keywords: Employee-Client Matching, Socio-economic Status, Homophily, Bottom of the Pyramid, Employee Productivity, Microfinance