Textualism, the Authoritativeness of Committee Reports, and Stanley Surrey

26 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2022 Last revised: 30 Jan 2023

See all articles by George K. Yin

George K. Yin

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: January 28, 2023


When Stanley Surrey—perhaps the most influential tax academic of the twentieth century—died in 1984, the school of thought sometimes known as the “new textualism” that has gained such influence in the United States over the last three decades had not yet emerged. Surrey would have been very interested in this development. As revealed in his recently published memoirs, he had extensive first-hand experience with the tax legislative process and recognized early on the connection between that process and statutory interpretation. He would have been surprised by some of the assumptions about the process underlying the new textualist claims as well as recent empirical findings about the process reported by scholars.

This essay aims to fill in some of Surrey’s missed engagement. Drawing on his memoirs and other sources, the essay describes aspects of the tax legislative process—the preparation of tax statutes and legislative history—of significance to statutory interpretation and the positions of the new textualists. Importantly, the description is at the granular level at which Surrey experienced it, material not generally included in standard political science or legal scholarship on the topic. After considering the on-the-ground special features of the tax legislative process, this essay contends that in interpreting tax statutes, courts should rely upon both textual canons and other common tools of judicial interpretation (questioned by recent scholar-empiricists) and legislative history (questioned by textualists). The essay also explains why, contrary to the claims of textualists, pre-enactment committee reports of all federal legislation, not just tax legislation, are authoritative evidence of statutory meaning.

Keywords: Textualism, legislative history, legislative process, statutory interpretation, committee reports, bill-drafting, canons

JEL Classification: A20, H11, H20, K34, K41, N82, P48

Suggested Citation

Yin, George K., Textualism, the Authoritativeness of Committee Reports, and Stanley Surrey (January 28, 2023). Law and Contemporary Problems, Forthcoming, Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2023-09, Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2023-02, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4286174 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4286174

George K. Yin (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States
434-924-7025 (Phone)
434-924-7536 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics