Asymmetric Cycles and Asymmetric Accounting

45 Pages Posted: 23 Dec 2022 Last revised: 10 May 2025

See all articles by Tong Lu

Tong Lu

University of Houston

Ellen Wang

University of Houston - C.T. Bauer College of Business

Chunxiao Xue

Wenzhou-Kean University

Date Written: December 13, 2022

Abstract

This study investigates how asymmetric accounting influences aggregate investment efficiency over boom–bust business cycles. Accounting asymmetry can be downward (conservative accounting) or upward (liberal accounting), with accounting symmetry (neutral accounting) as a special case. We find that neither symmetry nor upward asymmetry resolves the problem of aggregate underinvestment during booms, while extreme downward asymmetry creates a problem of aggregate overinvestment during busts. There exists a unique degree of downward asymmetry that maximizes aggregate investment efficiency. This efficiency-maximizing asymmetry varies with accounting and economic factors, such as quality of accounting system before introducing asymmetry, sensitivity of firms’ investment projects to state of the economy, and volatility of state. Our analysis highlights asymmetric accounting as a novel policy tool in macroeconomic management and as an additional consideration in the debate over neutrality versus conservatism in conceptual frameworks for financial reporting.

JEL Classification: E32, M41, M48

Suggested Citation

Lu, Tong and Wang, Ellen and Xue, Chunxiao, Asymmetric Cycles and Asymmetric Accounting (December 13, 2022). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4300872 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4300872

Tong Lu (Contact Author)

University of Houston ( email )

4800 Calhoun Road
Houston, TX 77204
United States

Ellen Wang

University of Houston - C.T. Bauer College of Business

Chunxiao Xue

Wenzhou-Kean University ( email )

88 Daxue Rd
Ouhai
Wenzhou, Zhejiang
China
057755870473 (Phone)
325060 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
179
Abstract Views
961
Rank
366,795
PlumX Metrics