SDG-11 and smart cities: Contradictions and overlaps between social and environmental justice research agendas

Sengupta U. and Sengupta U. (2022) SDG-11 and smart cities: Contradictions and overlaps between social and environmental justice research agendas. Frontiers in Sociology. 7:995603. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.995603

7 Pages Posted: 4 Jan 2023

See all articles by Ushnish Sengupta

Ushnish Sengupta

Algoma University

Ulysses Sengupta

Manchester School of Architecture

Date Written: November 29, 2022

Abstract

There is an increased role Information and Communications Technology (ICT) plays in the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This paper focuses specifically on SDG-11 “Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable” and how cities are increasingly incorporating ICT toward this goal. The public discourse on Smart Cities suggests economic, social and environmental benefits are possible through the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT). However, the increased deployment and use of digital infrastructure and processes in the name of sustainability and optimization itself is the focus of a growing body of critical literature on Smart Cities. This mini-review collates critical literature on digital infrastructures and processes related to SDG-11 and Smart Cities to identify areas of significance for further research. Although many Smart City projects discuss sustainability benefits, the distribution of benefits and risks across different communities is rarely examined. An increased use of ICT in Smart City projects can provide environmental benefits to some communities, while shifting the burden of risks to other communities. An increased use of ICT has its own energy and resource impacts that has implications for sustainability beyond the geography of individual cities to global impacts. The lifecycle and supply chain impacts of advanced ICT projects are being identified and documented. The end user of the Smart City projects may benefit significantly from the increased use of ICTs, while the environmental costs are often borne by disparate communities. In some cases, within the same city where a Smart City project is deployed, the inequities in distribution of environmental resources and services are exacerbated by layering new ICT implementations on top of existing socio-economic inequities. Therefore, this paper combines a broad view of Smart City environmental impacts, as well as a deep examination of the intersection of social justice and environmental justice issues to create more wholistic approaches for analysis of governance of Smart City projects. A more wholistic approach for governance of Smart City projects is required that includes combined social justice and environmental justice frameworks, toward achievement of SDG-11 goals.

Keywords: ICT, smart cities, environmental justice, social justice, Sustainable Development Goals, SDGs, SDG-11, sustainable cities, sustainable communities

JEL Classification: R11, R12, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, P16, P25, H71, H72, O33, O35

Suggested Citation

Sengupta, Ushnish and Sengupta, Ulysses, SDG-11 and smart cities: Contradictions and overlaps between social and environmental justice research agendas (November 29, 2022). Sengupta U. and Sengupta U. (2022) SDG-11 and smart cities: Contradictions and overlaps between social and environmental justice research agendas. Frontiers in Sociology. 7:995603. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.995603, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4311844

Ushnish Sengupta (Contact Author)

Algoma University ( email )

1520 Queen St. East
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 4G4
Canada

Ulysses Sengupta

Manchester School of Architecture ( email )

Room 3.08 MTC
Manchester
United Kingdom

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.msa.ac.uk/staff/usengupta/

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
98
Abstract Views
440
Rank
546,390
PlumX Metrics