NFTs, Property Rights, and Realty

THE CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF LAW AND POLICY FOR NFTS, Nizan Geslevich Packin, ed., Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming

U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2023-07

Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24-38

22 Pages Posted: 30 Dec 2022

See all articles by Juliet M. Moringiello

Juliet M. Moringiello

Widener University - Commonwealth Law School

Christopher K. Odinet

Texas A&M University School of Law

Date Written: December 29, 2022

Abstract

For over a decade now, the promise of distributed ledger technologies (often referred to merely as “blockchains”) has filled the minds of policy makers, politicians, investors, corporate giants, and even the general public. Headlines proclaim that “blockchain will transform business” and will “revolutionize the world economy.” Of late, the rise of non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) has added fuel to the fire, further enhancing the rhetoric around what crypto can do to change the world. And perhaps nowhere have these promises had more resonance than in the case of property rights. Blockchain technologies have been touted as a mechanism to track and resolve disputes over property, ranging from intellectual property to personalty to even real estate. It is with this final asset class—real property—that this Chapter concerns itself. In these pages, drawn in part from our earlier work, we question the use of blockchain networks and NFTs in real property transactions by interrogating how the existing technologies work against the backdrop of the realities of real property transfers. Moving beyond the hype, we explain that a blockchain system would provide few if any benefits to our system of real estate transactions.

Yet, we think there is indeed a potential use case for blockchains and crypto technology when it comes to property rights. But, it’s not in the world of real property—which our existing system has largely shown itself to be sufficient—but rather for intangible property. American law developed to deal with tangible assets—whether personal or real. This makes sense because these asset types represented the primary forms of wealth for most of history. But tracking and transferring rights in intangible property—particularly purely intangible personal property—has always been underdeveloped. It is here, so we argue, that blockchain technology and NFTs might have the highest utility.

Keywords: crypto, realty, real estate, blockchain, intangible, tangible, personalty, NFT, non-fungible token

Suggested Citation

Moringiello, Juliet M. and Odinet, Christopher K., NFTs, Property Rights, and Realty (December 29, 2022). THE CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF LAW AND POLICY FOR NFTS, Nizan Geslevich Packin, ed., Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming , U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2023-07, Texas A&M University School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 24-38, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4314999

Juliet M. Moringiello

Widener University - Commonwealth Law School ( email )

3800 Vartan Way
Harrisburg, PA 17110-9380
United States
717-541-3917 (Phone)

Christopher K. Odinet (Contact Author)

Texas A&M University School of Law ( email )

1515 Commerce St.
Fort Worth, TX Tarrant County 76102
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
253
Abstract Views
743
Rank
240,815
PlumX Metrics