Supply-Side Factors Identify Market Participants, Not Markets: Global Antitrust Institute Comment on the EC's Draft Notice on Defining Relevant Markets for EU Competition Law

5 Pages Posted: 10 Jan 2023

See all articles by Alexander Raskovich

Alexander Raskovich

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty

Douglas H. Ginsburg

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Bruce H. Kobayashi

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Abbott B. Lipsky

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Joshua D. Wright

Lodestar Law and Economics

John M. Yun

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Date Written: January 10, 2023

Abstract

The European Commission's recent draft Notice describes the use of supply-side substitution factors in defining relevant markets for the application of competition law. Expanding a defined market to include goods not substitutable on the demand side, based on the competitive strength of a broad swath of swing producers, would necessarily expand the set of relevant consumers to include groups who may have different purchasing options and vulnerability to harm. The Note states the EC will do so only if the consumer groups face a homogeneous competitive environment—a very restrictive condition. If this condition is not met, the EC will nonetheless take account of the competitive strength of swing producers in its competitive assessment, but according to principles left unstated. The procedure described in the Notice is problematic, or at best unclear. This comment by the Global Antitrust Institute recommends that the EC treat swing producers as participants in a relevant market if they can profitably swing production into the market quickly and without significant sunk costs, but that such supply-side factors should not be applied to the definition of a relevant market itself. Insofar as market definition (and identification of market participants) serves to "facilitate and structure" the EC's competitive assessment, ignoring swing producers as market participants would incorrectly evaluate their competitive strengths as zero, while at the same time falsely inflating the competitive strengths of the undertaking(s) and other current producers, with the potential of overstating the case for competitive harm.

Keywords: competition, antitrust, market definition, supply-side substitution

JEL Classification: K21, L13, L40

Suggested Citation

Raskovich, Alexander and Ginsburg, Douglas H. and Kobayashi, Bruce H. and Lipsky, Abbott B. and Wright, Joshua D. and Yun, John M., Supply-Side Factors Identify Market Participants, Not Markets: Global Antitrust Institute Comment on the EC's Draft Notice on Defining Relevant Markets for EU Competition Law (January 10, 2023). George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 23-02, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4321797 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4321797

Alexander Raskovich (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Douglas H. Ginsburg

U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ( email )

333 Constitution Ave NW
Room 5523
Washington, DC 20001
United States

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Bruce H. Kobayashi

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States
703-993-8034 (Phone)
703-993-8088 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://mason.gmu.edu/~bkobayas

Abbott B. Lipsky

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Joshua D. Wright

Lodestar Law and Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 751
Mclean, VA 22101
United States

John M. Yun

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
85
Abstract Views
736
Rank
546,269
PlumX Metrics