Civil Litigation with Mandatory Discovery and Voluntary Transmission of Private Information
University of Alabama Economics Working Paper No. 03-08-01
29 Pages Posted: 23 Sep 2003
Date Written: August 2003
Abstract
We consider models of pretrial negotiations where both costly voluntary disclosure and costly mandatory discovery are possible. When the uninformed party makes the final offer (the screening game), mandatory discovery will be utilized, if it is not very costly, but voluntary disclosure will not occur in the absence of a discovery procedure. When the informed party makes the final offer (the signaling game), mandatory discovery is never utilized, but voluntary disclosure will be utilized if it is not too costly to do so. Thus, mandatory discovery is effective in the information structure under which voluntary disclosure is not and vice versa. The results suggest that, taken together, the two institutions will lead to a great deal of information revelation and will significantly increase the probability of settlement.
Keywords: Mandatory Discovery, Voluntary Disclosure, Civil Litigation
JEL Classification: K41, C7
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
A New Theory Concerning the Credibility and Success of Threats to Sue
-
By Lucian A. Bebchuk and Alon Klement
-
Threats to Sue and Cost Divisibility Under Asymmetric Information
By Alon Klement
-
The Unexpected Value of Litigation
By Joseph Grundfest and Peter H. Huang
-
A Solution to the Problem of Nuisance Suits: The Option to Have the Court Bar Settlement
By David Rosenberg and Steven Shavell
-
Pretrial Signaling with Negative Expected Value Suits
By Amy Farmer and Paul Pecorino