The Usefulness of Corruptible Elections

44 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2003

See all articles by Loren Brandt

Loren Brandt

University of Toronto - Department of Economics; IZA Institute of Labor Economics

Matthew Turner

University of Toronto

Date Written: August 2003

Abstract

The belief that elections reduce rent seeking by government officials is widely held, likewise the belief that rent seeking decreases as elections are less subject to corruption. In this paper we develop and test a model in which these beliefs are carefully examined. Our model indicates that, while elections may provide a disincentive for rent seeking, this disincentive (1) need not actually materialise, and (2), is not necessarily correlated with the integrity of the electoral protocol. We next consider the ability of village-level elections in rural China to reduce rent seeking, and the extent to which this ability varies as the elections are more or less corruptible. We find that in practice, even elections that appear quite corruptible provide a strong disincentive to rent seeking. Moreover, our results indicate which types of electoral reform lead to more effective popular oversight of leaders, and which do not.

Keywords: Elections, Property rights, China

JEL Classification: H0, H7, D7, Q0

Suggested Citation

Brandt, Loren and Turner, Matthew A., The Usefulness of Corruptible Elections (August 2003). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=434041 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.434041

Loren Brandt (Contact Author)

University of Toronto - Department of Economics ( email )

150 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G7
Canada
416-978-4442 (Phone)
416-978-6713 (Fax)

IZA Institute of Labor Economics ( email )

P.O. Box 7240
Bonn, D-53072
Germany

Matthew A. Turner

University of Toronto ( email )

Department of Economics
150 St. George Street
Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G7
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
130
Abstract Views
1,558
Rank
398,343
PlumX Metrics