When Private Law Theory Is Close Enough

Forthcoming, Thilo Kuntz and Paul B. Miller, eds., Methodology in Private Law Theory (Oxford University Press)

Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 736

24 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2023 Last revised: 28 Apr 2023

See all articles by Andrew S. Gold

Andrew S. Gold

University of California, Irvine School of Law

Date Written: February 3, 2023

Abstract

Private law theorists often adopt concepts that are a close, but imperfect, fit for the concepts actually used in the law. Such theorists employ concepts that diverge moderately from the legal concepts courts themselves employ. In other cases, theorists may match the law’s concepts as a legal matter, but they employ concepts that diverge moderately from the concepts found in moral reasoning. Such theories diverge to some degree from the moral understanding, but they are still ‘in the right ballpark.’ This paper assesses the value in legal theories that come close to a set of target concepts, but which are not quite a fit for them.

Keywords: Private Law Theory, Tort, Contract, Fiduciary Law, Interpretivism, Normative Theory

Suggested Citation

Gold, Andrew S., When Private Law Theory Is Close Enough (February 3, 2023). Forthcoming, Thilo Kuntz and Paul B. Miller, eds., Methodology in Private Law Theory (Oxford University Press), Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 736, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4346482 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4346482

Andrew S. Gold (Contact Author)

University of California, Irvine School of Law ( email )

401 E. Peltason Dr.
Ste. 1000
Irvine, CA 92697-1000
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
179
Abstract Views
712
Rank
320,419
PlumX Metrics