Judicial Scarring

24 Pages Posted: 7 Feb 2023

Date Written: February 6, 2023

Abstract

I document that experienced decision makers can be influenced by irrelevant events in a high stakes setting, felony sentencing in Cook County. Using a stacked difference-in-differences design, I estimate that judges hand down sentences that are 13% longer after sentencing a first degree murder. The effect is twice as large for defendants who resemble the murderer along the dimensions of race and charge severity. The bias affects 6% of defendants on an ongoing basis and temporarily increases the Black sentencing penalty by 91%.

Keywords: Anchoring, Behavioral Bias, Judges, Salience, Sentencing, Sequential Decisions

JEL Classification: D91, J15, K14

Suggested Citation

Srinivasan, Karthik, Judicial Scarring (February 6, 2023). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4350411 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4350411

Karthik Srinivasan (Contact Author)

University of Chicago ( email )

5807 S Woodlawn Ave
Chicago, IL 60637
United States
4045562887 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
113
Abstract Views
522
Rank
428,865
PlumX Metrics