Innovations in stock matching and allocations: the social housing challenge

AHURI Final Report

114 Pages Posted:

See all articles by Iris Levin

Iris Levin

Swinburne University of Technology

Selina Tually

Centre for Housing, Urban and Regional Planning

Jacqueline De Vries

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Trevor Kollmann

Swinburne University of Technology - Centre for Transformative Innovation

Wendy Stone

Centre for Urban Transitions

Ian Goodwin-Smith

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: February 9, 2023

Abstract

This project examines whether current social housing allocation and matching policies and practices meet the needs of applicants or tenants and maximise social housing sector performance and efficiency outcomes. It looks at how to optimise housing stock allocations based on individual needs (including the role of support) and neighbourhood and community needs (avoiding concentrations of disadvantage and potential antisocial behaviour).

‘Allocation’ is the rationing of access to social housing, and ‘Matching’ is the process of trying to best fit the requirement of allocated households with the attributes of the available stock—including size, location and service access, as well as in terms of community harmony and individual wellbeing.

The research reviewed international and Australian policy, interviewed stakeholders across four jurisdictions (QLD, VIC, TAS and SA), developed an evaluation framework (Social Return on Investment - SROI) for housing allocation strategies.

The international policy review suggests the Choice-based lettings model could enhance tenants’ choice and reduce stigma; local allocation plans could improve tenant composition and social mix in specific neighbourhoods; policies to address underutilisation of social housing should be carefully considered; and programs integrating support services onsite to address tenants with complex needs should be more widespread.

The research findings suggest Governments should view the social housing sector as part of the larger housing market rather than as a separate, standalone system. The sector would benefit from expanding its limited target from tenants with highest need for housing integrated with other support, through to people with high need for housing but no need for other support, to people in need of affordable housing only in various forms.

Keywords: Social housing, allocation policies, stock matching, gaps analysis, social return on investment

JEL Classification: R00, R20, R21, R22, R28, R29, R30, R31, R38, R39, R40, R48, R49, R50, R53, R59, I30, I32, I38, I39

Suggested Citation

Levin, Iris and Tually, Selina and De Vries, Jacqueline and Kollmann, Trevor and Stone, Wendy and Goodwin-Smith, Ian, Innovations in stock matching and allocations: the social housing challenge (February 9, 2023). AHURI Final Report, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=

Iris Levin (Contact Author)

Swinburne University of Technology ( email )

Cnr Wakefield and William Streets, Hawthorn Victor
3122 Victoria, Victoria 3122
Australia

Selina Tually

Centre for Housing, Urban and Regional Planning ( email )

No 233 North Terrace, School of Commerce
Adelaide, South Australia 5005
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/selina.tually

Jacqueline De Vries

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Trevor Kollmann

Swinburne University of Technology - Centre for Transformative Innovation ( email )

Hawthorn, VIC
Australia

Wendy Stone

Centre for Urban Transitions ( email )

Cnr Wakefield and William Streets, Hawthorn Victor
3122 Victoria, Victoria 3122
Australia

HOME PAGE: http://www.swinburne.edu.au/health-arts-design/staff/profile/index.php?id=wmstone

Ian Goodwin-Smith

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
7
Abstract Views
15
PlumX Metrics