Invoice Tokenization for Deep-Tier Payables Finance

91 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2023 Last revised: 26 Mar 2024

See all articles by Jing Hou

Jing Hou

Fudan University - Department of Management Science

Burak Kazaz

Syracuse University - Whitman School of Management

Fasheng Xu

University of Connecticut - Department of Operations & Information Management

Date Written: March 22, 2024

Abstract

Invoices from tier-1 suppliers to the downstream anchor manufacturer can be tokenized onto a blockchain. The tier-1 suppliers are then able to split and transfer the tokens to their own (tier-2) suppliers, enabling deep-tier suppliers to sell tokens and secure financing at more affordable rates based on the manufacturer's superior credit rating. This paper investigates how invoice tokenization impacts the multitier supply chain's decisions and profits under different supply network configurations. Our research yields the following main insights. First, invoice tokenization always benefits the downstream manufacturer and the reliable tier-2 supplier, but can hurt the profits of other participants. If the tier-1 supplier allocates the manufacturer's order between the two tier-2 suppliers with different reliabilities (i.e., in the Y-shaped supply chain), the sourcing strategy switch brought by invoice tokenization makes the unreliable tier-2 supplier worse off with a zero profit. The tier-1 supplier can also be hurt because tier-1's leverage over the manufacturer is indirectly weakened. If the manufacturer directly controls how much to source from the two tier-2 suppliers through two different tier-1 suppliers (i.e., in the V-shaped supply chain), invoice tokenization reduces the unreliable tier-2 supplier's production quantity and even decreases the profit when the market potential is relatively large, but the manufacturer never abandons the unreliable branch. Second, when the market potential is relatively small, the manufacturer is more likely to initiate invoice tokenization in the V-shaped supply chain. The result, however, is reversed if the market potential is relatively high. Third, a higher credit risk of the manufacturer can increase the value of invoice tokenization, not only for the manufacturer but also for the whole supply chain network. Lastly, in the long run, the adoption of invoice tokenization may give rise to certain supply network formations with decreased stability.

Keywords: Invoice tokenization, FinTech, blockchain, payables finance, multitier supply chain, supply disruption, sourcing strategy

Suggested Citation

Hou, Jing and Kazaz, Burak and Xu, Fasheng, Invoice Tokenization for Deep-Tier Payables Finance (March 22, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4362566 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4362566

Jing Hou

Fudan University - Department of Management Science ( email )

Shanghai, 200433
China

Burak Kazaz

Syracuse University - Whitman School of Management ( email )

721 University Avenue
Syracuse, NY 13244
United States
(315) 443-7381 (Phone)
(315) 442-1461 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://https://bkazaz.expressions.syr.edu/

Fasheng Xu (Contact Author)

University of Connecticut - Department of Operations & Information Management ( email )

1 University Place
Stamford, CT 06901
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
351
Abstract Views
1,144
Rank
166,343
PlumX Metrics