Pension Fund Governance and the Choice between Defined Benefit and Defined Contribution Plans
32 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2003
Date Written: June 2003
Abstract
Recent events in several countries have underscored the importance of good governance in private occupational pension plans. The present Paper uses contract theory to analyse the interplay of residual claims and control rights in private pensions. The residual claimant is the plan sponsor in a defined benefit (DB) plan and the pool of beneficiaries in a defined contribution (DC) plan. The main control rights we examine relate to decisions on funding, asset allocation, and asset management. Under complete contracting, governance can be shown to be neutral: DC and DB plans differ only on risk allocation. If instead contracts are incomplete, a DB (DC) plan should: (1) Assign more vigilance responsibility to the sponsor (beneficiaries); (2) Rely less (more) on trustees; (3) Tend to employ trustees that are professional experts (caring insiders); (4) Assign asset allocation rights to the sponsor (beneficiaries); (5) have strict funding requirements.
Keywords: Pension fund, governance, private pension
JEL Classification: G23
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Administrative Costs in Public and Private Retirement Systems
-
"Public Sector Pension Governance and Performance"
By Olivia S. Mitchell and Ping Lung Hsin
-
Public Pension Governance, Funding, and Performance: A Longitudinal Appraisal
By Olivia S. Mitchell and Tongxuan Yang
-
By Estelle James, James H. Smalhout, ...
-
By Estelle James, Gary D. Ferrier, ...
-
By Olivia S. Mitchell and Roderick Carr
-
Upgrading the Investment Policy Framework of Public Pension Funds
By Dimitri Vittas, Gregorio Impavido, ...
-
Informal Gold Mining and Mercury Pollution in Brazil
By Ajay Shah and Kshama Fernandes