Immigration Law and Slavery: Rethinking the Migration or Importation Clause

56 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2023 Last revised: 20 Mar 2023

See all articles by Geoffrey Heeren

Geoffrey Heeren

University of Idaho College of Law

Date Written: March 5, 2023

Abstract

The traditional account of the origins of federal immigration law mostly glosses over its deep connection to slavery. An examination of that connection calls the constitutional foundation for immigration law into question, alters the calculus for judicial review of federal immigration action, reframes our understanding of federalism, and lays bare the nation’s exploitative dependence on immigrant labor. This article makes this paradigm shift by focusing on a long-neglected textual reference to a federal immigration power: the Migration or Importation Clause of Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 of the Constitution. Scholars have almost uniformly discounted the Migration or Importation Clause as relating to federal immigration power because of its connection to slavery. In sharp contrast, this article contends that the Migration or Importation Clause makes sense as a referent of the federal immigration power because of its connection to slavery, which was deeply intertwined in the early Republic with immigration.

The history of the Constitutional Convention reveals that the framers specifically discussed slavery and immigration together and were aware that their chosen wording for the Migration or Importation Clause would apply to free immigrants. An originalist understanding of the Clause therefore supports a federal immigration power under the Commerce Clause, which was the presumptive basis for regulating the slave trade after the 1808 date set out in the Migration or Importation Clause.

The legacy of the Migration or Importation Clause continues to be felt in immigration law. Slavery was an atrocity that inflicted intergenerational harm on blacks; in contrast, immigrants have often enjoyed opportunities and passed on wealth. Nonetheless, the current structure of immigration law perpetuates nineteenth century labor norms for the millions of undocumented workers who under threat of deportation do much of the nation’s most difficult work for lower pay and with fewer legal protections than documented workers. Reckoning with the ties between immigration law and slavery offers an opportunity to reflect on the failures of this system, and also reveals a redemptive path forward. In the face of an exploitative system, the strategies and logic of abolitionism offer hope for a better immigration future.

Keywords: Immigration, Slavery, Immigration Law, Race, Migration, Migration or Importation Clause, Slave Trade, Commerce Clause, Abolition, Abolitionism, Undocumented,

JEL Classification: J15

Suggested Citation

Heeren, Geoffrey, Immigration Law and Slavery: Rethinking the Migration or Importation Clause (March 5, 2023). Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2023, No. 4, 2023, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4378786 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4378786

Geoffrey Heeren (Contact Author)

University of Idaho College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 442321
Moscow, ID 83844-2321
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
217
Rank
536,757
PlumX Metrics