The Minimalist Alternative to Abolitionism: Focusing on the Non-dangerous Many

30 Pages Posted: 10 Mar 2023 Last revised: 23 Apr 2024

Date Written: March 6, 2023

Abstract

In The Dangerous Few: Taking Prison Abolition and Its Skeptics Seriously, published in the Harvard Law Review, Thomas Frampton proffers four reasons why those who want to abolish prisons should not budge from their position even for offenders who are considered dangerous. This essay demonstrates why a criminal law minimalist approach to prisons and police is preferable to abolition, not just when dealing with the dangerous few but also as a means of protecting the nondangerous many. A minimalist regime can radically reduce reliance on both prisons and police, without the loss in crime prevention capacity and legitimacy that is likely to come with abolition.

Keywords: abolitionism, sentencing, policing

Suggested Citation

Slobogin, Christopher, The Minimalist Alternative to Abolitionism: Focusing on the Non-dangerous Many (March 6, 2023). Vanderbilt Law Review, Forthcoming, Vanderbilt Law Research Paper No. 23-35, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4380898 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4380898

Christopher Slobogin (Contact Author)

Vanderbilt University - Law School ( email )

131 21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37203-1181
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
427
Abstract Views
1,342
Rank
135,546
PlumX Metrics