Is There a Payoff to Perceptual Accuracy?
INSEAD Working Paper No. 2003/49/MKT
57 Pages Posted: 4 Jan 2004
Date Written: July 2003
Abstract
Current theories of B2B relationships implicitly assume that the parties involved are accurate in their perceptions of each other. The present paper explores whether this assumption is justified, and what are the behavioral and economic consequences if parties misread the other party's states and behaviors. Using original dyadic data in the service industry, we show that firms that invest in developing accurate images of their counterparts are rewarded by relationships that function better and are more profitable. The mechanism by which this occurs is that perceptual accuracy leads firms to hold positive images of each other and to share the same goals. In turn, these factors reduce channel conflict and, thereby, increase the profit each side derives from its relationship. We show that perceptual accuracy improves over time, particularly when firms use the time to engage in frank communication.
Keywords: Perceptual accuracy, channel relationships, conflict, perceptual process, relationship duration, performance
JEL Classification: C42, D74, M31, L80
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
How Global are Global Brands? An Empirical Brand Equity Analysis
By Thomas Cleff, Lena Fischer, ...
-
Mapping the World of Consumption: Computational Linguistics Analysis of the Google Text Corpus
-
Factors Influencing Customer Trust Towards Vendors on the Mobile Internet
-
Are Luxury Brands a Distinct Brand Category: A Preliminary Investigation
-
Competing Brands Do Not Have Different 'Personality' Profiles
By John Dawes
-
Attitude-Based Versus Choice-Behavior-Based Success of Brand Extensions
By Alexander Rühle, Franziska Völckner, ...