Disrupting Data Cartels by Editing Wikipedia

23 Pages Posted: 22 Mar 2023 Last revised: 5 Dec 2023

See all articles by Amanda Levendowski

Amanda Levendowski

Georgetown University Law Center

Eun Hee Han

Georgetown University Law Center

Jonah Perlin

Georgetown University Law Center

Date Written: March 15, 2023

Abstract

Discourse in the digital public square is driven by legal memoranda, motions, briefs, contracts, legislation, testimony, and judicial opinions. And as lawyers are taught from their first day of law school, the strength of these genres of legal communication is built on authority. But finding that authority often depends on a duopoly of for-profit legal research resources: Westlaw and Lexis. Although contemporary legal practice relies on these databases, they are far from ethically neutral. Not only are these “data cartels” expensive—creating significant access to justice challenges—they also are controlled by parent companies that profit by providing information to Immigration and Customs Enforcement that is used to surveil, arrest, and deport immigrants, creating a sense of ethical unease in the colloquial sense. One way to make legal research (and by extension, legal practice) more publicly and ethically accessible is to find ways to increase the availability of alternative and supplemental options to research authority. That said, the challenge is that there are not enough free, public alternatives.

Wikipedia has the power to disrupt these data cartels and increase public access to legal information. The non-profit, publicly-funded encyclopedia that anyone can edit is already the silent first stop for many legal researchers including judges, lawyers, and the public. With expert editing by law students and junior lawyers Wikipedia could become much more than a first step. This Essay builds on the scholarly literature and multiple years of classroom experience to suggest that law students are particularly well-positioned to challenge the singular reliance on data cartels by reimagining Wikipedia’s place in law and legal education. Further, teaching law students how to use and maintain Wikipedia sidesteps colloquial ethical issues raised by data cartels and produces concrete benefits for students: editing creates substantive opportunities to investigate different genres of legal writing, allows integration of students’ legal research and writing skills into practice, and instills ethical service obligations and provides professional identity formation opportunities during students’ formative years. With proper training, law students can grow as lawyers and legal writers while also making significant and meaningful contributions to the accessibility of legal knowledge during law school and beyond by creating and editing Wikipedia articles that are free, accurate, and ethical sources of that knowledge.

Suggested Citation

Levendowski, Amanda and Han, Eun Hee and Perlin, Jonah, Disrupting Data Cartels by Editing Wikipedia (March 15, 2023). 25 Yale J.L. Tech (Forthcoming 2023) , Georgetown University Law Center Research Paper No. 2023/11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4390065 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4390065

Amanda Levendowski

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

Eun Hee Han

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States

Jonah Perlin (Contact Author)

Georgetown University Law Center ( email )

600 New Jersey Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20001

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
333
Abstract Views
1,765
Rank
166,901
PlumX Metrics