Antonio De La Rosa-Rodriguez v. Merrick B. Garland, Brief of Separation of Powers Clinic as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party

24 Pages Posted: 5 Apr 2023 Last revised: 27 Jan 2024

See all articles by R. Trent McCotter

R. Trent McCotter

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Date Written: April 3, 2023

Abstract

Amicus takes no position on the underlying statutory issue in this case but instead urges the en banc Court to expressly reject the notion of “hypothetical statutory jurisdiction.”

Hypothetical statutory jurisdiction is inconsistent with Supreme Court caselaw and the Constitution, illogical on its own terms, and causes significant detrimental consequences.

If this Court merely proceeds to resolve the underlying jurisdictional issue in this case without first forcefully rejecting the doctrine of hypothetical statutory jurisdiction, future panels could still assume hypothetical statutory jurisdiction to resolve merits issues. The en banc Court should squarely foreclose that possibility.

Keywords: Jurisdiction, Judicial Review, Separation of Powers

JEL Classification: K1, K40

Suggested Citation

McCotter, R. Trent, Antonio De La Rosa-Rodriguez v. Merrick B. Garland, Brief of Separation of Powers Clinic as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party (April 3, 2023). Gray Center Separation of Powers Brief 23-05, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4410059

R. Trent McCotter (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
242
PlumX Metrics