Vertical Contracting When Competition for Orders Precedes Procurement
Melbourne Business School Working Paper No. 2003-22
27 Pages Posted: 15 Oct 2003
Date Written: September 5, 2003
Abstract
This paper reverses the standard order between input supply negotiations and downstream competition and assumes that competition for orders takes place prior to procurement of inputs in a vertical chain. In an environment where procurement negotiations involve no private information and no restrictions on the form of pricing, it is found that oligopolistically competitive outcomes will result despite the presence of an upstream monopolist. It is demonstrated that vertical integration is a means by which the monopolist can leverage its market power downstream to the detriment of consumers. However, it does so, not by foreclosing on independent downstream firms, but by softening the competitive behaviour of its own integrated units. Thus, the paper provides a simple rationale for anti-competitive vertical integration in an environment that respects the usual Chicago school assumptions.
Keywords: vertical contracting, vertical integration, monopolisation, bargaining, competition
JEL Classification: L42
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Vertical Integration in the Presence of Upstream Competition
-
By Celine Bonnet and Pierre Dubois
-
By Jonas Bjornerstedt and Johan Stennek
-
Concentration-Based Merger Tests and Vertical Market Structure
-
Can Vertical Integration by a Monopsonist Harm Consumer Welfare?
-
Exclusivity, Competition and the Irrelevance of Internal Investment
By Catherine De Fontenay, Vivienne Groves, ...