New strategy, new accountability: The European Central Bank and the European Parliament after the strategy review

37 Pages Posted: 17 Apr 2023

Date Written: April 17, 2023

Abstract

A striking asymmetry defines the European Central Bank (ECB)’s approach to democratic accountability. Today’s ECB makes choices of a more complex and discretionary nature than originally envisaged for it by the 1992 Maastricht Treaty. At the same time, the central bank continues to hew closely to the Treaty’s scarce democratic accountability provisions. In this article, we document the dramatic changes to ECB decision-making by comparing the policy frameworks informing Governing Council deliberations according to the 1998, 2003 and 2021 strategies. We show that the transformation of the ECB’s monetary policy strategy has not been matched with enhanced accountability arrangements between the ECB and the European Parliament. The article concludes with ambitious, but concrete policy proposals – both in substance and form – for new ways of informing the public about monetary policy, instruments to improve accountability and coordinating monetary policy with other European policymakers.

Keywords: European Central Bank, European Parliament, monetary policy, accountability, interinstitutional agreement

JEL Classification: E42, E52, E58, K23

Suggested Citation

Grunewald, Seraina and van 't Klooster, Jens, New strategy, new accountability: The European Central Bank and the European Parliament after the strategy review (April 17, 2023). European Banking Institute Working Paper Series 2023 - no. 139, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4420805 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4420805

Seraina Grunewald (Contact Author)

Radboud University Nijmegen ( email )

Postbus 9108
Nijmegen, 6500 HK
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://https://www.ru.nl/english/people/grunewald-s/

Jens Van 't Klooster

University of Amsterdam ( email )

Roetersstraat 11
Amsterdam, NE 1018 WB
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
256
Abstract Views
755
Rank
205,152
PlumX Metrics