NYSRPA V. Bruen: Weaponizing Race

16 Pages Posted: 1 May 2023

See all articles by Daniel Harawa

Daniel Harawa

New York University School of Law

Date Written: September 30, 2022


While the Supreme Court has weaponized race—particularly America’s history of anti-Black racism—to expand the reach of the Second Amendment, it has not sought to ensure Black people have equal access to the right to bear arms now that the right is broader than ever before. More pointedly, the Court has not seemed keen on revisiting its Fourth Amendment policing doctrines that make public carry for Black people particularly precarious.

As this essay explains, itinerant invocations of racial justice are inadequate and potentially harmful. While, as some argued, the total elimination of gun licensing regimes may result in the reduced prosecution of Black people for gun possession, it also creates a whole new racial justice threat from law enforcement. Without serious revisions to Fourth Amendment policing doctrines, along with a real reckoning with the anti-Blackness endemic to America (but not only to America), Black people will never bear arms the same as white people. Or put differently, if a Black person does decide to carry a gun as freely as a white person, it will be at their peril. Bruen invokes racial justice without considering the full picture of America’s racial injustice.

Keywords: Race and the Law, Criminal Procedure, Second Amendment

Suggested Citation

Harawa, Daniel, NYSRPA V. Bruen: Weaponizing Race (September 30, 2022). Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 20, No. 163, 2022, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4421468

Daniel Harawa (Contact Author)

New York University School of Law ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics