Garfield County v. Biden, Brief of Proposed Amicus Curiae Separation of Powers Clinic

20 Pages Posted: 25 Apr 2023 Last revised: 27 Jan 2024

See all articles by R. Trent McCotter

R. Trent McCotter

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School

Lauren E Aragon

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School

Morgan E Uveges

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School

Date Written: April 21, 2023

Abstract

The Framers of the Constitution, reacting to centuries of regal excesses that had plundered England’s national resources, gave Congress the power to issue needful rules and regulations to govern federally owned lands, and Congress in turn authorized the President to designate national monuments within narrowly prescribed limits. The President now asserts unlimited discretion to designate every inch of federal property as a monument and then also escape judicial review altogether. The Court should reject Defendants’ arguments.

Keywords: Separation of Powers, Federalism, Congress, Federal Land, Property, National Monuments, Judicial Review

JEL Classification: H1, H10, H11, H77

Suggested Citation

McCotter, R. Trent and Aragon, Lauren and Uveges, Morgan, Garfield County v. Biden, Brief of Proposed Amicus Curiae Separation of Powers Clinic (April 21, 2023). Gray Center Separation of Powers Brief 23-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4427854

R. Trent McCotter (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Lauren Aragon

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Morgan Uveges

George Mason University, Antonin Scalia Law School ( email )

3301 Fairfax Drive
Arlington, VA 22201
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
88
Abstract Views
392
Rank
626,982
PlumX Metrics