Bush’s and Lande’s Differing Perspectives of Mediation Theory

4 Pages Posted: 10 May 2023

See all articles by John Lande

John Lande

University of Missouri School of Law

Date Written: May 10, 2023

Abstract

This article summarizes and contrasts two articles published in the Cardozo Journal on Dispute Resolution expressing differing perspectives about basic mediation theory. One is Professor Robert A. Baruch Bush’s article, Beyond the Toolbox: Values-Based Models of Mediation Practice. The other is my article, Real Mediation Systems to Help Parties and Mediators Achieve Their Goals. Prof. Bush believes that a system of theoretical models is critically important. I believe that a dispute system design framework enables mediators and mediation stakeholders, especially parties, to more accurately understand and characterize how mediators think and act – and to act accordingly. Prof. Bush’s article prompted me to develop a Real Practice Systems Project, which I describe in my article.

Keywords: mediation, theory, models, dispute system design, facilitative mediation, evaluative mediation, transformative mediation, real practice system, teaching, training, practice, preparation

Suggested Citation

Lande, John, Bush’s and Lande’s Differing Perspectives of Mediation Theory (May 10, 2023). University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2023-09, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4444532

John Lande (Contact Author)

University of Missouri School of Law ( email )

Hulston Hall
Columbia, MO 65211
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
93
Abstract Views
286
Rank
551,846
PlumX Metrics