Abolishing Juvenile Interrogation

63 Pages Posted: 5 Jun 2023 Last revised: 27 Nov 2023

See all articles by Samantha Buckingham

Samantha Buckingham

Loyola Law School - Center for Juvenile Law and Policy

Date Written: May 1, 2023


Rehabilitation is a paramount consideration in abolishing police interrogation of youth. Interrogation is one of the first interactions young people have with the criminal legal system. Unfortunately, the most common methods of interrogation are coercive rather than consensual. Youth are uniquely vulnerable to coercive methods, especially in conjunction with racial, socioeconomic, and ableist hierarchies. Youth vulnerability requires more protective legal standards than those applied to mature adults. Current police practices, permitted by the very structure of the law, harm youth at a critical stage of their development and legal socialization. Interrogation is a missed opportunity to consider how every legal actor can incentivize youth to respect and follow the law. Reforms and scholarly proposals focused on adjusting police behavior or changing the circumstances of youth interrogation fail to ameliorate harm to youth. This Article examines how police interrogation of a youthful suspect may undercut rehabilitation by damaging that young person’s sense of belonging and desire to behave as society hopes. This Article concludes that the most appropriate and practicable solution is a categorical ban on officer-initiated interrogation of youth.

Suggested Citation

Buckingham, Samantha, Abolishing Juvenile Interrogation (May 1, 2023). Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2023-10, 101 N.C. L. REV. 1015 (2023), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4467824

Samantha Buckingham (Contact Author)

Loyola Law School - Center for Juvenile Law and Policy ( email )

919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-1328 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics