Biases in Legal Decision Making: Comparing Prosecutors, Defense Attorneys, Law Students, and Laypersons

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (forthcoming)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper Forthcoming

43 Pages Posted: 21 Jun 2023 Last revised: 26 Sep 2023

See all articles by Doron Teichman

Doron Teichman

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law

Ilana Ritov

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - School of Education

Eyal Zamir

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 11, 2023

Abstract

Previous studies of judgment and decision-making in adjudication have largely focused on juries and judges. This body of work demonstrated that legal training and professional experience sometimes affect attitudes and mitigate the susceptibility to cognitive biases, but often they do not. Relatively few experimental studies examined the decisions of prosecutors and defense lawyers, although they play a major role, especially in legal systems where prosecutors have a broad discretion in charging decisions, courts’ discretion regarding sentencing is constrained, and plea bargains abound.

This study directly compares laypersons, law students, and legal practitioners—including prosecutors and defense lawyers – in terms of their attitudes about the criminal justice system and their cognitive biases. It was found that the outcome bias and the anti-inference bias influenced all groups similarly, but an irrelevant anchor only impacted the decisions of laypersons and law students, and not those of legal professionals. Prosecutors were significantly more inclined to judge a behavior as negligent and reach factual conclusions supporting a conviction. However, the hypothesis that the susceptibility of prosecutors and defense lawyers to cognitive biases would be affected by their role was not borne out. The article considers possible explanations for the reported findings, and discusses their policy implications.

Keywords: Anchoring, Anti-inference bias, Cognitive biases - training and expertise, Defense lawyers, Motivated reasoning, Outcome bias, Prosecutors,

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Suggested Citation

Teichman, Doron and Ritov, Ilana and Zamir, Eyal, Biases in Legal Decision Making: Comparing Prosecutors, Defense Attorneys, Law Students, and Laypersons (April 11, 2023). Journal of Empirical Legal Studies (forthcoming), Hebrew University of Jerusalem Legal Research Paper Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4483376

Doron Teichman (Contact Author)

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel

Ilana Ritov

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - School of Education ( email )

Mt. Scopus
Jerusalem, 91905
Israel
+972 2 652 9929 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://pluto.huji.ac.il/~msiritov/ilana_ritov.htm

Eyal Zamir

Hebrew University of Jerusalem - Faculty of Law ( email )

Mount Scopus
Mount Scopus, IL 91905
Israel
+972 2 582 3845 (Phone)
+972 2 582 9002 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
234
Abstract Views
917
Rank
259,747
PlumX Metrics