The Judicial Nondelegation Doctrine

43 Pages Posted: 26 Jun 2023 Last revised: 23 Aug 2023

See all articles by Jason Iuliano

Jason Iuliano

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Date Written: June 21, 2023

Abstract

“Nondelegation doctrine.” Lawyers know it as the rule barring Congress from delegating power to other branches of government. The doctrine, however, has another side—one that applies to the judiciary. This aspect of the doctrine holds that courts may not delegate judicial power to other branches of government. Nonetheless, courts do precisely that. And they do it thousands of times each and every day. Judges empower non-judicial actors to do everything from making legal findings and rendering sentences to resolving custody disputes and setting probation conditions.

This Article is the first to explore the constitutionality of these kinds of delegations. To that end, this piece presents an original dataset of more than one thousand judicial nondelegation challenges. Reviewing these cases will illustrate the scope of judicial delegations, the problems with current case law, and the need for a clear rule to guide courts in delegating judicial power. This Article concludes by arguing that courts should look to the Intelligible Principle Standard for such a guiding rule.

Suggested Citation

Iuliano, Jason, The Judicial Nondelegation Doctrine (June 21, 2023). Alabama Law Review, 2024, Forthcoming , University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 558, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4487504

Jason Iuliano (Contact Author)

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )

383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
109
Abstract Views
382
Rank
522,658
PlumX Metrics