How Replaceable is a Low-Wage Job?

102 Pages Posted: 10 Jul 2023 Last revised: 4 Dec 2024

See all articles by Evan K. Rose

Evan K. Rose

University of Chicago

Yotam Shem-Tov

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: July 2023

Abstract

We study the long-run consequences of losing a low-wage job using linked employer-employee wage records and household surveys. For full-time workers earning $15 per hour or less, job loss due to an idiosyncratic, firm-wide contraction generates a 13% reduction in earnings six years later and over $40,000 cumulative lost earnings. Most of the long-run decrease stems from reductions in employment and hours as opposed to wage rates: job losers are twice as likely to report being unemployed and looking for work. By contrast, workers initially earning $15-$30 per hour see comparable long-run earnings losses driven primarily by reductions in hourly wages. Calibrating a dynamic job ladder model to the estimates implies that the rents from holding a full-time $15 per hour job relative to unemployment are worth about $20,000, more than seven times monthly earnings.

Institutional subscribers to the NBER working paper series, and residents of developing countries may download this paper without additional charge at www.nber.org.

Suggested Citation

Rose, Evan K. and Shem-Tov, Yotam, How Replaceable is a Low-Wage Job? (July 2023). NBER Working Paper No. w31447, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4505077

Evan K. Rose (Contact Author)

University of Chicago ( email )

1101 East 58th Street
Chicago, IL 60637
United States

Yotam Shem-Tov

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) ( email )

405 Hilgard Avenue
Box 951361
Los Angeles, CA 90095
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
12
Abstract Views
279
PlumX Metrics