Trade Wars: The Exaggerated Impact of Trade in Economic Debate
35 Pages Posted: 28 Sep 2003 Last revised: 30 Oct 2022
Date Written: October 2003
Abstract
The rules governing trade and capital flows have been at the center of controversy as globalization has proceeded. One reason is the belief that trade and capital flows have massive effects on the labor market -- either positive, per the claims of international financial institutions and free trade enthusiasts, or negative, per the ubiquitous protestors at WTO, IMF, and World Bank meetings demanding global labor standards. Comparing the claims made in this debate with the outcomes of trade agreements, this paper finds that the debate has exaggerated the effects of trade on economies and the labor market. Changes in trade policy have had modest impacts on labour market. Other aspects of globalization -- immigration, capital flows, and technology transfer -- have greater impacts, with volatile capital flows creating great risk for the well-being of workers. As for labor standards, global standards do not threaten the comparative advantage of developing countries nor do poor labor standards create a race to the bottom'.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda
By Kym Anderson and Will J. Martin
-
The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act and its Rules of Origin: Generosity Undermined?
By Aaditya Mattoo, Devesh Roy, ...
-
The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act and its Rules of Origin Generosity Undermined?
By Aaditya Mattoo, Devesh Roy, ...
-
Market Structure and Market Access
By Joseph F. Francois and Ian Wooton
-
Commercial Policy Variability, Bindings and Market Access
By Joseph F. Francois and Will J. Martin
-
Commercial Policy Variability, Bindings and Market Access
By Joseph F. Francois and Will J. Martin
-
By Bernard Hoekman, Marcelo Olarreaga, ...