Non-Disclosure and the Misrepresentation Act 1967: A New Framework

Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly [2023] pp. 58-81

25 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2023 Last revised: 26 Jan 2024

See all articles by Fred Halbhuber

Fred Halbhuber

Yale Law School; University of Cambridge

Date Written: February 23, 2023

Abstract

It has become generally accepted that use of the phrase “misrepresentation … made” in the Misrepresentation Act 1967 excludes from the scope of s.2(1) certain cases of misrepresentation by non-disclosure. This article challenges this orthodox interpretation. It will be argued that, rather than importing a narrow definition of the word “made”, the applicability of s.2(1) in cases of misrepresentation by non-disclosure can, and should, be delimited by reference to the requirements of the tort of deceit. This alternative approach introduces much needed certainty to the scope of s.2(1); avoids an undesirable disconnect between the scope of s.2(1) and the tort of deceit; and unburdens the other sections of the 1967 Act from the restrictive and unintended effects of the orthodox interpretation.

Keywords: Misrepresentation, Non-Disclosure, Misrepresentation Act 1967, Deceit, Uberrimae Fidei

Suggested Citation

Halbhuber, Fred, Non-Disclosure and the Misrepresentation Act 1967: A New Framework (February 23, 2023). Lloyd's Maritime and Commercial Law Quarterly [2023] pp. 58-81, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4508866 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4508866

University of Cambridge ( email )

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
172
Abstract Views
2,174
Rank
345,504
PlumX Metrics