Locating Liability for Medical AI

31 Pages Posted: 31 Jul 2023 Last revised: 15 May 2024

See all articles by W. Nicholson Price II

W. Nicholson Price II

University of Michigan Law School

I. Glenn Cohen

Harvard Law School

Date Written: July 21, 2023

Abstract

When medical AI systems fail, who should be responsible, and how? We argue that various features of medical AI complicate the application of existing tort doctrines and render them ineffective at creating incentives for the safe and effective use of medical AI. In addition to complexity and opacity, the problem of contextual bias, where medical AI systems vary substantially in performance from place to place, hampers traditional doctrines. We suggest instead the application of enterprise liability to hospitals—making them broadly liable for negligent injuries occurring within the hospital system—with an important caveat: hospitals must have access to the information needed for adaptation and monitoring. If that information is unavailable, we suggest that liability should shift from hospitals to the developers keeping information secret.

Keywords: AI, artificial intelligence, liability, tort, medical AI, malpractice, enterprise liability

Suggested Citation

Price II, William Nicholson and Cohen, I. Glenn, Locating Liability for Medical AI (July 21, 2023). DePaul Law Review, Forthcoming, U of Michigan Public Law Research Paper No. 23-037, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4517740 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4517740

William Nicholson Price II (Contact Author)

University of Michigan Law School ( email )

625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States

I. Glenn Cohen

Harvard Law School ( email )

1525 Massachusetts Avenue
Griswold Hall 503
Cambridge, 02138
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
268
Abstract Views
2,036
Rank
240,093
PlumX Metrics