Modularity, Vertical Integration, and Open Access Policies: Towards a Convergence of Antitrust and Regulation in the Internet Age
50 Pages Posted: 20 Oct 2003
Antitrust law and telecommunications regulation have long adopted different stances on whether to mandate open access to information platforms. This article aims to help regulators and commentators incorporate both Chicago School and post-Chicago School arguments in evaluating this basic policy choice, suggesting how they can be integrated in an effective manner. In particular, the authors outline three alternative models that the FCC could adopt to guide its regulation of information platforms and facilitate a true convergence between antitrust and regulatory policy.
JEL Classification: L0, L1, L4, L5, O3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination
By Tim Wu
Towards an Economic Framework for Network Neutrality Regulation
The Benefits and Risks of Mandating Network Neutrality, and the Quest for a Balanced Policy
By Jon M. Peha
Scenarios for the Network Neutrality Arms Race
By William Lehr, Sharon Gillett, ...
Would Mandating Broadband Network Neutrality Help or Hurt Competition? A Comment on the End-to-End Debate
Network Neutrality or Bias? - Handicapping the Odds for a Tiered and Branded Internet
By Rob Frieden
The Net Neutrality Debate: Twenty Five Years After United States v. AT&T and 120 Years After the Act to Regulate Commerce
Natural Experiments in U.S. Broadband Regulation
By Thomas W. Hazlett and Anil Caliskan
Bandwidth Usage and Management: A UK Case Study
By Alissa Cooper, Arnaud Jacquet, ...