Systematic Conservation Planning for Antarctic Research Stations

41 Pages Posted: 3 Aug 2023

See all articles by Shaun Timothy Brooks

Shaun Timothy Brooks

Government of the Commonwealth of Australia - CSIRO Health & Biosecurity

Julia Jabour

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Kevin Hughes

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Fraser Morgan

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Peter Convey

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Elias Polymeropoulos

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Dana Bergstrom

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Abstract

The small ice-free areas of Antarctica are essential locations for biodiversity and scientific research but are subject to considerable and expanding human impacts, resulting primarily from station-based research and support activities, and local tourism. Awareness by operators of the need to conserve natural values in and around station and visitor site footprints exists, but the cumulative nature of impacts often results in reactive rather than proactive management. With human activity spread across many isolated pockets of ice-free ground, the pathway to the greatest reduction of human impacts within this natural reserve is through better management of these areas which are impacted the most. Using a case study of Australia’s Casey Station, we found significant natural values persist within the immediate proximity (<10 m) of long-term station infrastructure, but encroachment by physical disturbance results in ongoing pressures. Deliberate planning to better conserve such values would provide a direct opportunity to enhance protection of Antarctica’s environment. Here we introduce an approach to systematic conservation planning, tailored to Antarctic research stations, to help managers improve the conservation of values surrounding their activity locations. Use of this approach provides a potential mechanism to balance the need for scientific access to the continent with international obligations to protect the environment. It may also facilitate the development of subordinate conservation tools, including management plans and natural capital accounting. By proactively minimising and containing their station footprint, national programs can also independently demonstrate their commitment to protecting Antarctica’s environment.

Keywords: Footprint, pressures, human impacts, biodiversity, management plan, natural capital.

Suggested Citation

Brooks, Shaun Timothy and Jabour, Julia and Hughes, Kevin and Morgan, Fraser and Convey, Peter and Polymeropoulos, Elias and Bergstrom, Dana, Systematic Conservation Planning for Antarctic Research Stations. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4530572 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4530572

Shaun Timothy Brooks (Contact Author)

Government of the Commonwealth of Australia - CSIRO Health & Biosecurity ( email )

United States

Julia Jabour

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Nigeria

Kevin Hughes

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Nigeria

Fraser Morgan

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Nigeria

Peter Convey

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Nigeria

Elias Polymeropoulos

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Nigeria

Dana Bergstrom

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Nigeria

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
106
Abstract Views
574
Rank
560,334
PlumX Metrics