Peer Effects in ESG Ratings: Evidence from Gender Pay Gap Disclosures

51 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2023 Last revised: 6 Feb 2024

See all articles by Tanja Keeve

Tanja Keeve

Frankfurt School of Finance & Management

Date Written: January 31, 2024

Abstract

ESG rating agencies promote competition among firms for better ratings by selecting global peers and benchmarking. I show that unregulated rating peer firms respond to the introduction of mandatory gender pay gap reporting in the United Kingdom (UK) by adopting similar disclosures voluntarily when their exposure to UK peers is high. This is more likely when mandated UK peers are lower-rated ex ante and when unregulated firms report better performance, indicating expected rating benefits factor into their disclosure decisions. Alternative peer definitions based on industry or market capitalization do not subsume this effect of ESG rating agency-selected peers. Firms’ disclosure response goes beyond a direct mimicking UK peers' GPG disclosure, extending to alternative social dimension topics. Combined, the findings highlight the role of ESG rating agencies in expanding the reach of ESG disclosure regulation beyond its actual scope, both geographically and to additional disclosure subjects.

Keywords: ESG ratings, benchmarking, peer effects, voluntary disclosure, gender pay gap disclosure

JEL Classification: M14, M48, D70

Suggested Citation

Keeve, Tanja, Peer Effects in ESG Ratings: Evidence from Gender Pay Gap Disclosures (January 31, 2024). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4536239 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4536239

Tanja Keeve (Contact Author)

Frankfurt School of Finance & Management ( email )

Adickesallee 32-34
Frankfurt am Main, 60322
Germany

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
391
Abstract Views
1,307
Rank
161,860
PlumX Metrics