Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment?

26 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2023 Last revised: 30 Nov 2023

See all articles by Richard M. Re

Richard M. Re

University of Virginia School of Law

Date Written: August 14, 2023

Abstract

Perhaps the most surprising feature of the last Supreme Court term was the extraordinary public discourse on 303 Creative LLC v. Elenis. According to many commentators, the Court decided what was really a “fake” or “made up” case brought by someone who asserted standing merely because “she worries.” As a doctrinal matter, these criticisms are unfounded. But what makes this episode interesting is that the criticisms came from the legal left, which has long been associated with expansive principles of standing. Doubts about standing in 303 Creative may therefore portend a broader standing realignment, in which liberal justices become jurisdictionally hawkish. In the past, justices who found themselves out of power have often tried to tighten justiciability principles. So, now that the Court has shifted decidedly rightward, it makes some sense for there to be an ideological reversal on federal court jurisdiction.

Suggested Citation

Re, Richard M., Does the Discourse on 303 Creative Portend a Standing Realignment? (August 14, 2023). 99 Notre Dame Law Review Reflection 1 (2023), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4540213

Richard M. Re (Contact Author)

University of Virginia School of Law ( email )

580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
812
Abstract Views
2,543
Rank
55,300
PlumX Metrics