Comparing Protection Types in the Peruvian Amazon Multiple-Use Protected Areas Did No Worse for Forests

27 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2023

See all articles by Jimena Rico

Jimena Rico

University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)

Zhenhua Wang

University of Missouri

Alexander Pfaff

Duke University - Policy, Economics, Environment

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs), which restrict economic activities, are the leading land and marine policy for ecosystem conservation. Most contexts feature different types of protection that vary in their stringency of management. Using spatially detailed panel data for 1986-2018, we estimate PAs’ impacts upon forests in the Peruvian Amazon. Which type of protection has greater impacts on the forest is ambiguous, theoretically, given potential for significant differences by type in siting and enforcement. We find that the less strict multiple-use PAs, that allow local livelihoods, do no worse for forests than strict PAs: each PA type holds off small loss spikes seen in unprotected forests; and multiple-use, if anything, do a bit better. This adds to evidence on the coexistence of private activities with conservation objectives.

Keywords: Forest, deforestation, Peru, Amazon, protected areas, Management, category, IUCN, Impact evaluation, difference-in-differences

Suggested Citation

Rico, Jimena and Wang, Zhenhua and Pfaff, Alexander, Comparing Protection Types in the Peruvian Amazon Multiple-Use Protected Areas Did No Worse for Forests. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4540784 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4540784

Jimena Rico (Contact Author)

University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) ( email )

Zhenhua Wang

University of Missouri ( email )

Alexander Pfaff

Duke University - Policy, Economics, Environment ( email )

201 Science Drive
Box 90312
Durham, NC 27708-0239
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
188
Rank
701,125
PlumX Metrics