Prosecutors as Partisans

25 Pages Posted: 21 Aug 2023 Last revised: 3 Oct 2023

See all articles by Lauren M. Ouziel

Lauren M. Ouziel

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law

Date Written: August 16, 2023

Abstract

Prosecution in the United States has long been political. But the nature of prosecutorial politics is changing. Once bipartisan and largely reactive, the politics of prosecution is more partisan and proactive, in ways that both reflect and amplify larger cleavages in American society. This Essay considers the upsides and downsides of this development. On the one hand, political contestation over prosecution democratizes criminal enforcement, stimulates public thinking and debate about the role and purpose of criminal law, and promotes local political agency. On the other, it risks falling prey to the same pitfalls that have impoverished American political life generally in recent decades: societal division, decline in reasoned assessment, difficulties forging sustainable compromise, and erosion of trust in institutions. The Essay concludes with some thoughts on how to maximize the upsides and minimize the downsides in this new era of partisan prosecutorial politics.

Keywords: Prosecutors, politics, democracy, partisanship, crime

Suggested Citation

Ouziel, Lauren M., Prosecutors as Partisans (August 16, 2023). Fordham Urban Law Journal, Forthcoming, Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2023-19, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4542582

Lauren M. Ouziel (Contact Author)

Temple University - James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )

1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19122
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
98
Abstract Views
363
Rank
534,168
PlumX Metrics