Reflections on the Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R v Sharma

22 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2023

See all articles by Colton Fehr

Colton Fehr

University of Saskatchewan - College of Law

Date Written: August 18, 2023

Abstract

The criminal law has been criticized for failing to engage with the right to equality when delineating its permissible scope. While these criticisms are forceful, they must also be tempered by the structure of judicial review. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in R v Sharma is illustrative. Despite an avid dissent, a narrow majority found that Parliament’s decision to amend a prior sentencing law that conferred a benefit to a minority group could not by itself sustain a violation of the right to equality. This approach is principled as any other interpretation would undermine the constitutional framework for punishment under the Charter. This follows as the essence of the constitutional challenge in Sharma concerned whether refusing to permit a conditional sentence order for select offences would result in an unconstitutional punishment. By finding a violation of the right to equality, the minority circumvented the gross disproportionality standard required to declare a punishment unconstitutional under section 12 of the Charter. In its place, the minority would have imposed a mere proportionality standard under section 1 for any punishment laws that retract a previously granted benefit to a minority group. Such an approach might be justifiable if there were no other means to consider equality interests when determining the constitutionality of sentencing laws. However, that is not the case as the reasonable hypothetical offender analysis under section 12 can ensure that the equality considerations implicit in the criminal law are given due weight. While conducting the analysis under section 12 does not change the result in Sharma, it upholds the principle underlying that provision requiring the scope of sentencing policy to remain reasonably broad to account for differing political opinions about the appropriate course of criminal justice.

Keywords: Equality; Criminal Law; Constitutional Law; Punishment

JEL Classification: K14; K19

Suggested Citation

Fehr, Colton, Reflections on the Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in R v Sharma (August 18, 2023). Alberta Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 4, 2023, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4545153

Colton Fehr (Contact Author)

University of Saskatchewan - College of Law ( email )

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Canada

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
107
Abstract Views
329
Rank
550,743
PlumX Metrics