The Jacobson Question: Individual Rights, Expertise, and Public Health Necessity

UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 23-19

COVID-19 and the Law: Disruption, Impact, and Legacy, (Edited by I. Glenn Cohen, Abbe R. Gluck, Katherine L. Kraschel, Carmel Shachar), (Forthcoming 2023).

12 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2023

See all articles by Lindsay F. Wiley

Lindsay F. Wiley

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Date Written: February 9, 2022

Abstract

In the post-2020 era, litigants are calling on courts to answer the Jacobson question: is Jacobson v. Massachusetts still a valid precedent? This chapter argues that the foundational principles enshrined in Jacobson endure, but public health advocates will need to craft new arguments that incorporate these principles within modern (and sometimes less deferential) standards of judicial review.

Keywords: judicial review, substantive due process, bodily autonomy, public health law, vaccination, emergencies, coronavirus, COVID-19, pandemic, quarantine, social distancing, separation of powers, federalism

JEL Classification: I18, K32, K40

Suggested Citation

Wiley, Lindsay Freeman, The Jacobson Question: Individual Rights, Expertise, and Public Health Necessity (February 9, 2022). UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 23-19, COVID-19 and the Law: Disruption, Impact, and Legacy, (Edited by I. Glenn Cohen, Abbe R. Gluck, Katherine L. Kraschel, Carmel Shachar), (Forthcoming 2023)., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4547475

Lindsay Freeman Wiley (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law ( email )

385 Charles E. Young Dr. East
Room 1242
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1476
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
82
Abstract Views
534
Rank
700,269
PlumX Metrics