A Simple Tax Case Complicated by Race

13 Pages Posted: 28 Aug 2023 Last revised: 26 Mar 2024

Date Written: August 26, 2023


Scholars and policymakers have begun to consider the racial inequities that are imbedded in the U.S. tax system. Most research addresses the racially inequitable design of the tax code or some of the racially inequitable practices that the I.R.S. employs to administer the code. However, virtually no scholarship discusses the role of the courts. This Article addresses that omission by using a little-known case to show that judges are not immune from allowing race to affect their judgments in tax cases and the ramifications that follow when they do so. The case involves the white builder of a segregated Black community in New Orleans called Pontchartrain Park. The builder sold some undeveloped land that was originally intended to be part of the subdivision, and the judge had to determine whether the profits from the sale had to be taxed at ordinary rates or as a long-term capital gain. Although the operative rule makes no reference to race, the judge used the racial identity of the homebuyers as a central part of his analysis. This Article examines the court’s reasoning and its implications.

Keywords: implicit bias, judicial bias, tax, racial bias

Suggested Citation

Winchester, Richard, A Simple Tax Case Complicated by Race (August 26, 2023). 21 Pitt. Tax Rev. 37 (2023), Seton Hall Law School Legal Studies Research Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4552461 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4552461

Richard Winchester (Contact Author)

Seton Hall Law School ( email )

One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102
United States
973-642-8882 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics