No Peeking: Addressing Pretextual Inspection Demands by Competitor-Affiliated Shareholders

11 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2023 Last revised: 5 Sep 2023

See all articles by Lynn Bai

Lynn Bai

University of Cincinnati - College of Law

Sean Meyer

University of Cincinnati - University of Cincinnati, College of Law, Students

Date Written: August 30, 2023

Abstract

This article exposes how Delaware private companies are vulnerable to pretextual inspections under the guise of valuation by shareholders who are affiliated with competitors of the companies. The Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2020 decision in Woods v. Sahara Enterprises, Inc., which deviated from established law by switching the initial burden of proof of the shareholder’s motive to the target company, exacerbated this vulnerability. This article argues for reversing that decision and proposes changes in multiple areas of law to help companies fend off prying competitors who abuse statutory shareholder inspection rights for unfair advantages in competition.

Keywords: pretextual inspections, valuation, shareholders inspections Delaware Court of Chancery, Woods v. Sahara Enterprises Inc., inspection rights, unfair competition

JEL Classification: K2, K22

Suggested Citation

Bai, Lynn and Meyer, Sean, No Peeking: Addressing Pretextual Inspection Demands by Competitor-Affiliated Shareholders (August 30, 2023). __ Va. L. & Bus. Rev. __ (Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4557829

Lynn Bai (Contact Author)

University of Cincinnati - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210040
Cincinnati, OH 45221-0040
United States
513-556-0194 (Phone)

Sean Meyer

University of Cincinnati - University of Cincinnati, College of Law, Students ( email )

United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
65
Abstract Views
283
Rank
690,197
PlumX Metrics