Lending Experimentalism: A New Regulatory Approach to Payday Loans

38 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2023 Last revised: 25 Mar 2024

Date Written: March 25, 2024


Payday loans entangle consumers with few alternatives in catastrophically harmful cycles of borrowing. But because of their design, payday loans are vexingly difficult to regulate effectively.

This article explains how the structure of regulatory oversight of payday lending abets lenders’ evasion. In it, I focus on how dynamism, the financial sector’s ability to quickly evolve, frustrates attempts to regulate payday lending in two ways: first, lenders employ a strategy of regulatory arbitrage to escape exacting state laws. Second, lenders take advantage of product innovation—what I call “recharacterization” — to circumvent state regulations by modifying loan attributes.

To overcome this dynamism, I argue regulators should consider an experimentalist approach to regulation. A regulatory structure of this kind would have three components: first, regulators must adopt a broad “ability-to-pay” standard, which centers the borrower’s financial wellbeing. Second, regulators must find partners embedded in communities to license as lenders. Finally, regulators must conduct a holistic review of borrower financial health after receiving a loan.

Suggested Citation

Berman, David, Lending Experimentalism: A New Regulatory Approach to Payday Loans (March 25, 2024). Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law Policy, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4560142 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4560142

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics