Hamilton's Copyright and the Election of 1800

2024 Wisconsin Law Review 729

60 Pages Posted: 26 Sep 2023 Last revised: 10 May 2024

See all articles by Tejas N. Narechania

Tejas N. Narechania

University of California, Berkeley, School of Law

Date Written: April 30, 2024

Abstract

Copyright is, perhaps surprisingly, a regular fixture of electoral campaigns. Candidates deploy copyright to obscure prior policy statements. Local governments assert copyright over recordings of public meetings to protect incumbents. And campaign committees have used copyright to prevent counter-advertisements, which respond to (by embedding) their adversaries’ ads. Are these examples of illegal copyright infringement or protected political speech?

The Supreme Court has balanced copyright and First Amendment interests by looking both to copyright law’s internal doctrinal limits (e.g., fair use) and to the “historical record.” But, in political contexts, the doctrine is sparing: candidates for public office, weighing the pressures of campaigning against the costs of copyright litigation, tend to prefer self-censorship—undermining protections for political speech.

The historical record may help. This Article highlights an episode—overlooked until now—that sheds new light on the speech-copyright equilibrium. Drawing on a mix of primary and secondary sources outside the legal literature, it tells the story of Alexander Hamilton’s secret, copyrighted pamphlet aimed at unseating John Adams from the top of the Federalist Party—secret, that is, until it leaked to Hamilton’s political opposition. Viewed in its entirety, this episode may reflect a shared—shared by both Hamilton and his adversaries—if contested understanding that favors a full and fair discussion of such matters of public importance, even if copyright’s rules might otherwise restrain such speech. This political precedent may thus have implications for the contemporary controversies in which candidates deploy copyright (and related speech restraints) to squelch public scrutiny over their prior statements regarding, say, abortion rights. And so this Article concludes by describing how the public governance interests in such political speech should trump copyright’s restraints.

Keywords: copyright, political speech, Hamilton, election, campaign, campaign speech, election of 1800, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson

Suggested Citation

Narechania, Tejas N., Hamilton's Copyright and the Election of 1800 (April 30, 2024). 2024 Wisconsin Law Review 729, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4563977

Tejas N. Narechania (Contact Author)

University of California, Berkeley, School of Law ( email )

Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.tejasnarechania.net

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Abstract Views
526
Rank
548,957
PlumX Metrics