Merger Control in Japan: "In Informal Remedies We Trust"
The University of Tokyo Law Review, Vol. 18 (December 2023), 172-188, http://www.sllr.j.u-tokyo.ac.jp/18/papers/LR18_vandewalle.pdf
17 Pages Posted: 27 Oct 2023 Last revised: 7 Jan 2025
Date Written: September 20, 2023
Abstract
This article aims to shed light on Japan’s experience with merger remedies, i.e. the measures which companies take to obtain the Japan Fair Trade Commission’s approval of a deal that would otherwise harm competition. Japan’s system of ex ante merger control is the oldest in the world and remedies have played a key role in the system. Remarkably, the Japan Fair Trade Commission (JFTC) has never prohibited a merger and the system has now functioned for more than seventy years without any court intervention. The process through which remedies are negotiated and approved is informal and operates based on guidelines issued by the JFTC. This article argues that, although the system seems to grant the JFTC significant power and discretion, the JFTC has not used this power to extract far-reaching remedies. Instead, from the viewpoint of the companies involved, it has shown restraint and been pragmatic rather than principled.
The published version of this paper is available for free at
Citation: Simon Vande Walle, Merger Control in Japan: "In Informal Remedies We Trust", 18 University of Tokyo Law Review 172-188 (2023).
Keywords: antitrust, competition law, merger control, Japan, remedies
JEL Classification: K21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation