Mathur v Ontario: Grounds for Optimism About the Recognition of a Constitutional Right to a Stable Climate System in Canada?

45 Pages Posted: 31 Oct 2023

See all articles by Stepan Wood

Stepan Wood

Peter A Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia

Date Written: September 24, 2023

Abstract

In January 2024, the Court of Appeal for Ontario heard an appeal from a lower court’s dismissal of the first Canadian children’s climate case to be decided on the merits. Mathur v. Ontario alleges that Ontario’s climate change legislation, target and plan violate young people’s rights under sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms by committing the province to dangerously high levels of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This article argues that there are good grounds to allow the appeal. Some favourable findings will likely be upheld, including the court’s acceptance of climate change science, the global carbon budget, global GHG targets, the inadequacy of Ontario’s new target, the disproportionate impacts of climate change on youth and Indigenous peoples, its rejection of a de minimis defence, and its conclusion that the case as a whole is justiciable. There are, however, grounds to reverse the court’s holdings that Ontario’s share of global GHG emission reductions is not justiciable, the alleged harm is not the result of the impugned state action, the claimed right is positive rather than negative, a positive right is not warranted in this case, any deprivation of section 7 rights accords with principles of fundamental justice, and the impugned state action does not constitute age discrimination. The article also addresses some issues left unresolved by the lower court that may prove important on appeal. Whatever happens, the case will set a key precedent for Canadian environmental rights litigation.

Keywords: climate change, climate litigation, environmental rights, human right to a healthy environment, Canada, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, justiciability, standing, future generations, fundamental justice, positive rights, negative rights, age discrimination, children's climate cases

JEL Classification: K32, K41, I14, I18, Q35, Q38, Q40, Q48, Q54, Q56, Q58, K19, K39

Suggested Citation

Wood, Stepan, Mathur v Ontario: Grounds for Optimism About the Recognition of a Constitutional Right to a Stable Climate System in Canada? (September 24, 2023). McGill Law Journal 69(1): 3-47, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4591439

Stepan Wood (Contact Author)

Peter A Allard School of Law, University of British Columbia ( email )

1822 East Mall
Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z1
Canada
+1 604-827-0441 (Phone)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
301
Abstract Views
845
Rank
206,628
PlumX Metrics