The Performance of Initial Public Offerings and the Cross Section of Institutional Ownership
Northwestern University Finance Working Paper
51 Pages Posted: 2 Jan 2004
Date Written: November 22, 2003
Abstract
The paper examines the relation between the cross section of institutional ownership in IPOs and subsequent returns. We find that the level of institutional ownership shortly after the IPO and subsequent changes in holdings forecast future performance up to three years after the issue date. IPOs in the highest institutional ownership quintile outperform IPOs in the lowest quintile by roughly 1% a month after adjusting for risk. Controlling for market conditions, return predictability is limited to 'hot markets' characterized by high volume of IPOs and large first day returns. The performance of IPOs widely held by institutions does not reflect initial 'undervaluation' and subsequent price correction. Rather, institutional investors hold stocks with high growth expectations that experienced a strong price run-up in the past. The findings are consistent with institutional investors acting as momentum traders and enjoying high profits in periods where 'sentiment' is high.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing and Allocations
By Jay R. Ritter and Ivo Welch
-
A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations
By Ivo Welch and Jay R. Ritter
-
Why Don't Issuers Get Upset About Leaving Money on the Table in Ipos?
By Tim Loughran and Jay R. Ritter
-
Underpricing and Entrepreneurial Wealth Losses in Ipos: Theory and Evidence
-
Common Stock Offerings Across the Business Cycle: Theory and Evidence
By Hyuk Choe, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert
-
IPO Market Cycles: Bubbles or Sequential Learning?
By Michelle Lowry and G. William Schwert