Equal Protection and Racial Categories

39 Pages Posted: 18 Oct 2023 Last revised: 30 Jan 2024

See all articles by GianCarlo Canaparo

GianCarlo Canaparo

The Heritage Foundation

Jameson Payne

Kent State University

Date Written: September 1, 2023

Abstract

Equal protection challenges to racially discriminatory state actions typically proceed as follows: the government gives preferential treatment to a group of people based on their race, and then a member of a racial group that does not receive the preference sues arguing that the government’s use of race did not satisfy strict scrutiny. These sorts of cases are familiar, and the doctrine that governs them is well established. Recently, however, courts have encountered a new sort of equal protection challenge. These proceed as follows: the government gives preferential treatment by race, and then someone who does not receive the preference sues arguing not that the government improperly used race to distribute the preference but that it erred in excluding him from the racial group that received the preference. In other words, the challenge is not to the discriminatory distinction drawn between racial groups, but to the contours of the racial groups themselves. The few courts to encounter these new challenges have been confused about how the doctrine applies to them. They should not have been; the doctrine is already well-suited to resolving these claims. The upshot is that courts must scrutinize racial categories and do so with the same level of scrutiny that they apply to distinctions between racial categories. This inquiry is necessary because challenges to racial categories are likely to proliferate given increased scholarly and judicial criticism of the arbitrariness of America’s racial categories.

The first-principles approach that we take here to Equal Protection doctrine combined with the new research revealing the arbitrariness of America's racial categories has implications beyond the new sort of equal protection challenges. We explore those implications and conclude that many racial preferences in common use today are, in fact, unconstitutional and will have to be curtailed.

Keywords: Equal protection, constitution, race, racial preferences, affirmative action, discrimination, jurisprudence

Suggested Citation

Canaparo, GianCarlo and Payne, Jameson, Equal Protection and Racial Categories (September 1, 2023). George Mason University Civil Rights Law Journal (CRLJ), Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4592694

GianCarlo Canaparo (Contact Author)

The Heritage Foundation

214 Massachusetts Ave NE
Washington, DC 20002-4999
United States

Jameson Payne

Kent State University

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
1,015
Rank
417,364
PlumX Metrics