Stakeholder Amnesia in M&A Deals

Journal of Corporation Law, Volume 50 (forthcoming 2024)

73 Pages Posted: 9 Oct 2023 Last revised: 1 Feb 2024

See all articles by Caley Petrucci

Caley Petrucci

University of San Diego School of Law

Guhan Subramanian

Harvard Business School

Date Written: October 31, 2022

Abstract

The most fundamental and longstanding debate in corporate law—the purpose of the corporation—has found new energy in connection with broader discussions about the power of modern corporations and their role in society. Companies have increasingly embraced the consideration of employees, communities, and other stakeholders in the course of everyday business. However, these same considerations are virtually non-existent in merger and acquisition (M&A) transactions. Elon Musk’s recent acquisition of Twitter provides an illustration of this stark disconnect. Prior to the transaction, Twitter pursued numerous stakeholder-centric goals. In contrast, Musk had taken a skeptical, if not hostile, stance toward stakeholder governance. When Twitter negotiated its sale to Musk, the board succumbed to “stakeholder amnesia”—overlooking its stakeholder commitments in favor of the high-premium all-cash offer from Musk. Twitter is not alone: stakeholder amnesia is a widespread phenomenon in M&A.

In this Article, we argue that corporate boards have the legal and practical ability to consider stakeholder interests in their dealmaking. We examine three of the most significant barriers that might prevent a board from incorporating their stakeholder-related objectives into transactions—fiduciary duties, negotiation leverage, and contractual feasibility—and  demonstrate that, outside of the Revlon context, none of these are compelling barriers. Rather, boards that consider stakeholder interests in their dealmaking can be acting consistently with their fiduciary duties. Moreover, boards often have the negotiation leverage and capability to incorporate stakeholder protections into their contractual agreements. We conclude that stakeholder considerations can pervade all aspects of managerial decision-making, including decisions about the sale of the company. In doing so, we also provide specific recommendations for courts, boards, and transaction planners.

Keywords: stakeholder governance, ESG, environmental, social, governance, stakeholders, stakeholder capitalism, shareholder, shareholder primacy, corporate social responsibility, corporate purpose, Twitter, Elon Musk, M&A, deals, dealmaking, mergers, acquisitions, transactions, corporate law, SEC, climate, diversity, employees, boards, board of directors, directors JEL Classification: D21, G32, G34, G38, K22

JEL Classification: D21, G32, G34, G38, K22

Suggested Citation

Petrucci, Caley and Subramanian, Guhan, Stakeholder Amnesia in M&A Deals (October 31, 2022). Journal of Corporation Law, Volume 50 (forthcoming 2024), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4594776 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4594776

Caley Petrucci (Contact Author)

University of San Diego School of Law ( email )

5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States

Guhan Subramanian

Harvard Business School ( email )

Soldiers Field Road
Morgan 270C
Boston, MA 02163
United States
617-495-9784 (Phone)
617-496-7379 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
703
Abstract Views
1,965
Rank
72,366
PlumX Metrics