Judges in Their Own Cases: Biblical Kings and Supreme Court Justices

47 Pages Posted: 14 Nov 2023

See all articles by Joshua Segev

Joshua Segev

Netanya Academic College School of Law; Bar-Ilan University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 26, 2023


Allegations that the justices of the Federal Supreme Court are judges in their own cases and that they judge themselves leniently are common. These allegations are often accompanied by an association with kings, queens, and monarchy, accountable to no one but their own divine authority. This Article took this association seriously and used the biblical story of prophet Nathan's rebuke of King David for his sin towards Bathsheba and Uriah to explain the problems, tensions, and conflicting considerations of the contemporary recusal doctrine of the Federal Supreme Court. This biblical judicial tale has two possible conclusions, depending on two different interpretations.

The first interpretation appeals to Nathan's status as a court prophet and the caution his job necessitated. A court prophet is a member of the royal court who is dependent on the king and is in his service. This interpretation illustrates the need for institutional arrangements that secure judicial independence and impartiality by guaranteeing the judge’s term of office or by drawing a line to separate proper judicial interactions and relations from inappropriate judicial ties to politicians, interest groups, wealthy benefactors, and other potential litigants. According to the second interpretation, the poor man’s ewe lamb parable is a juridical parable meant to induce David to judge himself by the same yardstick he applies to others. This interpretation suggests an utmost need to install a neutral third-party review, stipulate discovery, provide a full explanation, and adhere to precedents.

Despite the striking similarities between the legal conditions of biblical kings and Supreme Court Justice, the Article concludes, after careful consideration, that the practices of Supreme Court Justices are not like those of biblical kings. They are worse, much worse. The problem is not that the justices judge themselves but rather that contrary to biblical kings, the rules, and principles intended to regulate their self-judgment are almost nonexistent.

Keywords: Federal Supreme Court, Recusal, Judicial Ethics, Biblical Law

Suggested Citation

Segev, Joshua, Judges in Their Own Cases: Biblical Kings and Supreme Court Justices (October 26, 2023). Touro Law Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4614123

Joshua Segev (Contact Author)

Netanya Academic College School of Law ( email )

1 University St.

Bar-Ilan University - Faculty of Law ( email )

Faculty of Law
Ramat Gan, 52900

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics