Digital Migration Control Infrastructure as Worldmaking

37 Pages Posted: 13 Dec 2023 Last revised: 23 Feb 2024

See all articles by Laura M Bingham

Laura M Bingham

Temple University, James E. Beasley School of Law

Santiago Narváez

Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales

Teresa Perosa

Surveillance Resistance Lab

Mizue Aizeki

Surveillance Resistance Lab

Date Written: November 7, 2023

Abstract

This article identifies and analyzes a typology of technologies at the intersection of tech-based worldmaking, on one hand, and contests over monopolizing control of global human mobility, on the other. The technologies we examine in three empirical case studies share an acute leveraging of scaling effects innate to their design and the economic system in which they emerge – the capability to reshape, overnight, the reality and orientation of asylum systems; or to oversee seamless, boundary-free sorting of friends and enemies. In each case, we investigate which properties make a tool ripe for use in worldmaking. By “worldmaking” we mean the construction, organization, and shaping of social reality with the ambition of planetary scale. Our guiding hypothesis is that technological progress in the realm of controlling human mobility follows a logic that has yet to be fully conceptualized, requiring a new empirical approach to understand the means and ends of power in a complex system. We also hypothesize that, in the backdrop of our study, there is an undeclared scramble to monopolize the future global migration infrastructure, with an undeclared common understanding among all contenders (state, supranational, corporate) that this future will run on omnipresent, deterritorialized digital surveillance technologies. We close with the idea that worldmaking and conceptualizing new logics of migration control also opens up new foundations for kinship and solidarity. With this brief survey of three case studies bearing the hallmarks of brutalist worldmaking in migration control infrastructure, we offer a scaffolding for further thought about additional typologies or features in a still-emerging system logic. We also advance a call for more field research to inform, correct or amend the framework provided here.

Keywords: Digital infrastructure, migration control, socio-technical systems, worldmaking, expulsion, surveillance, repression, social credit

Suggested Citation

Bingham, Laura M and Narváez, Santiago and Perosa, Teresa and Aizeki, Mizue, Digital Migration Control Infrastructure as Worldmaking (November 7, 2023). University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy, Forthcoming, Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2024-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4625286

Laura M Bingham (Contact Author)

Temple University, James E. Beasley School of Law ( email )

1719 N. Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA
United States

Santiago Narváez

Red en Defensa de los Derechos Digitales ( email )

San Ramón 14
Col. Del Valle Centro
Mexico City, Alcaldía Benito Juárez 03100
Mexico

Teresa Perosa

Surveillance Resistance Lab ( email )

HOME PAGE: http://surveillanceresistancelab.org

Mizue Aizeki

Surveillance Resistance Lab

121 Avenue of the Americas, 6th Floor
New York, NY New York 10013
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
205
Abstract Views
816
Rank
294,901
PlumX Metrics